🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.